In tradition with my last outing at Youth Teams, I ended up in a team with teammates whom I have never really played with before.
Much thanks to Kelvin (Ng) who was the matchmaker and hooked me up with Xiaoming, Xiaoling and Kenneth. Our later additions were Zhibang and Xiaoxuan so I was the odd one out in a HC alumni team.
Throughout the tournament, I partnered Xiaoming who did a brilliant job, if I am not wrong, he played all 90 boards, partnering Xiaoxuan when I took a break during the Sunday morning session to attend Easter service. It is with great shame that I admit I doubted him on a few occasions which didn’t give very good results of course. Moral of the story: Trust your partner, for he might very well turn out to play even better than you.
My first task for Xiaoming was to attend the captain’s meeting in place of him, where they decided to draw instead of playing adjacent team numbers in the first round, which meant we would avoid playing X-men and YMouse in a triangle. Instead we got TS, which featured Mr and Mrs Thomas Goh. Having played them often at the weekly games, I was well aware of the threat they posed. Nevertheless, I hoped that we would be able to get off to a good start.
We started with board 4, which saw:
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| 1♣ |
X |
p |
1♥ |
| 1♠ |
2♥ |
2♠ |
3♥ |
| 3♠ |
A |
| Dealer |
W |
| Vul |
All |
| Scoring |
Imp |
| Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
It was bad enough that we sold out to them when we had 4H cold. Even worse was the fact that we could have downed 3S, but let them make 10 tricks instead. Xiaoming led the Ace of Hearts, but was confused by my 6, which could have been easily solved had i thrown the Q down. He switched to a club instead. Teammates went 2 off in 4S. -9 imps.
But of course, our opponents did not see the full picture. The next board saw them bidding to 3H, making 10 tricks. This was a cold game though. I could sense that after these 2 boards, our opponents probably thought that they had conceded two game swings. In reality, we were still 3 imps behind even after the non-vul game swing on board 4.
Board 6 saw them bid to a cold 3NT after a few rounds of bidding. I made a mistake on the first trick. Holding AQJ7, with 5432 in dummy and partner leads the 9 (this shows 0 or 2 higher honours). What do you play? I went up with the A and returned a spade. Declarer cleared out partner’s diamond A and cashed his tricks for +2, Of course, it was cold either way but this still wasn’t a good play by me. Lost an imp to the overtrick.
Board 7 saw both myself and my counterpart going off 2 in 2NT. Board 8 saw Xiaoming go 4 off in 3C after West opened a weak 2S. Teammates made 4S. Score 6 imps to us. Board 9 was an overtrick’s difference in our favour in 2D contracts.
Despite the fact that I had a string of negative scores in my scoresheet, I was pretty optimistic. The boards looked pretty flat, and teammates should be holding the ground pretty well. Boards 4 and 5 might even be good for us. (I didn’t look into the possibility of 4H on board 4.)
Now on board 10, teammates made a 3NT which in theory fails, but in practice makes as South would not lead from AQxx in clubs. Our opponents at the table had a misunderstanding, and ended up in 3D+1. This board scored 11 imps for us.
Board 1 seemed flat as it was a pretty routine 1NT-2H-2S. Xiaoming made 10 tricks. The element of luck for us was the misunderstanding at the other table where South misbid 2D instead of 2H, and spent 3 levels trying to convince North that he had spades. 4NT-4 and 2S+2 scored 9 imps.
Board 3 was interesting.
|
|
 |
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| |
|
|
1NT |
| 2♥ |
2NT |
p |
3♣ |
| p |
3♦ |
p |
3NT |
| p |
p |
p |
Why 1NT? I had the inkling that opps would overcall if I opened 1C, perhaps with 1S and make life difficult. As it is, the 1NT opening worked. I decided that 3NT had a chance with my stops and Qxx in partner’s presumbly long suit, which might depend on a finesse. As it is, I was right, but the finesse was wrong, so I went down. 2 imps to them.
We won 35-12 which translated to a 22-8 victory.
Permalink
February 27, 2008 @ 20:16
· Filed under SCBA Weekly games
A return to Friday night Pairs at SCBA after 3 weeks. The search for a partner proved elusive…until I found Jason aka Pinochio on BBO.
We finished 3rd with 54.5% thanks to several lucky boards:
First up, a really bad slam that makes.
| Dealer |
E |
| Vul |
- |
| Scoring |
MP |
| Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
6D did I hear you say? We played in 6S!
| West |
North |
East |
South |
| |
|
1♠ |
p |
| 2♦ |
3♣ |
3♦ |
p |
| 4♠ |
p |
6♠ |
AP |
After the lead, Jason led a small heart from table to hand, N dropping the J. He thus decided to play for a 3-3 break in trumps and N for KJ bare in Hearts. Small from hand to small to table felled the K and 12 tricks was for the taking.
Not as fortituous, but the way Jason played it amazed even our opponents.
| Dealer |
N |
| Vul |
- |
| Scoring |
MP |
| Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Bidding was simple: After Jason opened 4H, I did a check on keycards and placed the contract in 6H.
How did he play it? He played the trumps by playing A and another! When E (a well-known expert in local circles) played the K on the 2nd round and saw his partner contribute the Q, he raised an eyebrow. After the hand was over, he tried to lecture Jason on his method of playing the hand. No comments =)
Some bad mistakes by me include holding up Aces unnecessarily on defence. This happened at least twice, rather expensively. Once on the other board in the same round as the preceding example, allowing E to make 1NT+2 when 7 tricks was the maximum.
And of course, we have free gifts.
| Dealer |
S |
| Vul |
E/W |
| Scoring |
MP |
| Lead |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
I can’t remember the exact bidding, but After I bid to 4S as W, S took a very long time to think, and finally returned with a bid of 5D, which Jason was happy to double.
Having seen Jason open 1C, I was happy to lead KC and another, which eventually led to a result of down 4 for a happy score of +800. (Which was a top, of course)
Permalink
February 21, 2008 @ 22:43
· Filed under Tournaments
Thanks Gerben for your suggestion.
I performed the triangle as suggested, though I worked it out myself on Monday night, and set up an Excel file for scoring. (ACBLScore doesn’t handle the half match triangles, and I couldn’t be bothered to figure out ASE Scorer)
In the end:
- 3 rounds of 4 boards each.
- In the 2nd round, one team which was in the triangle actually had players who went missing. After 10 minutes, I gave up and started the two other teams to play normally.
- Plenty of players who shuffled the boards after playing them, thus I had to scrape several boards.
- Sitting in the wrong direction as well, what with a team having 2 NS pairs.
- Slow play in general
- Games were usually a trashing or pretty close.
Nonetheless, this was all pretty much anticipated as majority of the players are playing contract bridge for the first time. (I now make it a point to educate people that floating bridge aka Singaporean bridge on wikipedia is NOT real bridge.)
I came up with my own 4 board 20 VP scale, to simplify things. This was done with reference to the other existing 20 VP scales.
In the end, two houses came up with the same VP total from their three teams, but one house had a penalty due to some infraction, so the winner won by 1 VP.
Amazingly, there were no lead out of turns, but there were 2 established revokes, and I was called once when the players belatedly realised that declarer had played from the wrong hand on the previous trick.
Permalink
« Previous entries